Home › Meetings › Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee — 2026-10-15
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee — 2026-10-15
Projects discussed: Ripley Road and Reif Street Intersection Upgrade
1. Response to Notice of Motion - Rehabilitation of the Playing Fields at Silver Jubilee Park, Spring Mountain
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13388198
ITEM: 1
SUBJECT: Response to Notice of Motion - Rehabilitation of the Playing Fields at Silver Jubilee Park, Spring Mountain
AUTHOR: Field Services Manager
DATE: 23 September 2026
This is a report responding to a Notice of Motion submitted by Deputy Mayor Nicole Jonic at the Ordinary Council Meeting of 27 August 2026, requesting recommended and costed scope of works for the rehabilitation of the two (2) rectangular playing fields at Silver Jubilee Park, Spring Mountain.
Recommendation/s
A. That council note the findings of the independent agronomic assessment regarding:
a. the condition and suitability of the underlying soil profile and substrate;
b. drainage and field preparation requirements;
c. turf species suitability for the intended sporting uses and local conditions; and
d. irrigation system performance considerations and the recommendation for a detailed irrigation audit.
B. That council consider support of Option 2 – Enhanced Maintenance, Soil Recovery and Turf Improvement Program as the preferred rehabilitation option and refer the option for future budget consideration.
C. That council note that the preferred rehabilitation program is intended to improve field safety, playability, durability and medium to long term resilience while providing an opportunity to evaluate alternative turf species under local conditions before consideration of more extensive renewal works.
D. That council note that the estimated cost of the preferred rehabilitation option is in the order of $300,000 to $400,000, with actual costs to be confirmed through further detailed investigation, scope development and market engagement.
E. That council note that no approved funding allocation currently exists for the proposed rehabilitation works and that delivery of the preferred option would require:
a. identification of an appropriate funding source; and
b. consideration through a future budget amendment, capital works program allocation, or other funding mechanism approved by Council.
F. That council note that, subject to funding approval, further detailed scoping, irrigation assessment, procurement activities and cost verification will be undertaken prior to commencement of works.
G. That council note the proposed procurement and delivery approach outlined within the report, including an indicative delivery timeframe of approximately 12 months from funding approval, subject to field closure availability, operational requirements and seasonal influences.
RELATED PARTIES
There was no declaration of conflicts of interest
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
This report responds to Council's Notice of Motion requesting a recommended scope of works for the rehabilitation of the two rectangular playing fields at Silver Jubilee Sporting Fields, Spring Mountain, and consideration of the following:
· the condition and suitability of the underlying soil profile and substrate;
· drainage and field preparation requirements;
· selection of turf species appropriate to the intended sporting uses and local conditions;
· the capacity and effectiveness of the irrigation system;
· an estimated cost of rehabilitation works;
· identification of an appropriate funding source; and
· a proposed delivery approach.
The condition of the playing fields has been impacted by a combination of high utilisation, turf performance limitations and underlying soil health challenges. An independent agronomic assessment identified opportunities to improve field performance through soil remediation, maintenance interventions, turf enhancement strategies and potential turf replacement.
TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
An independent sports field audit was undertaken at Silver Jubilee Park in 2026 to evaluate the condition of the existing sports field and identify factors influencing surface performance and durability. The assessment considered the underlying soil profile and substrate, drainage characteristics, field preparation requirements, turf species performance, and factors affecting moisture management. The audit findings provide technical information to assist Council in considering future renewal and improvement options for the site.
Condition and suitability of the underlying soil profile and substrate.
The assessment identified a "Dark top layer (4cm) and sandy deep soil profile", with root depth assessed as "marginally low". Root depth was considered below the desirable level for sports turf, noting that "An average minimum root depth of 100mm is recommended for sports turf and park situations although a root depth greater than 200mm is desirable". Opportunities for improvement were identified through a structured aeration program and the incorporation of soil amendments to address potential sub-surface compaction. Improving soil structure at depth was identified as a means to enhance "root development, drainage, and overall turf resilience."
Drainage and field preparation requirements.
Infiltration testing indicated that surface permeability was within an acceptable range and drainage was not identified as a primary constraint to turf performance.
The assessment highlighted the importance of water movement through the profile, noting that "Infiltration of water through the turf and soil is critical for efficient irrigation, absorption of rainfall and drainage." Recommended field preparation and maintenance activities included "Hollow or solid tine coring followed up with organic and CEC-improving amendments" together with ongoing aeration to support soil structure, drainage performance and turf resilience.
Selection of turf species appropriate to the intended sporting uses and local conditions.
The playing surface was identified as being established in “ Grand Prix couchgrass (Cynodon spp.)” . Performance of the turf variety under site conditions was identified as a concern, with findings noting that "Grand Prix hasn't performed as expected at Silver Jubilee Park" and that it "has not performed to expected standards under site conditions, particularly under sustained traffic pressure." Persistent thinning was linked to its "moderate recovery capacity and seasonal decline in vigour".
Consideration was therefore given to alternative turf varieties with stronger recovery characteristics. The assessment identified Wintergreen couch as a suitable alternative due to its proven adaptability in Queensland conditions, reliable performance in subtropical climates, and tolerance to heat, humidity and periods of heavy rainfall.
Wintergreen is currently the predominant turf species utilised across many of Council's sporting fields and has demonstrated strong durability, recovery characteristics and resilience under regular sporting use. While the species has a proven track record across Council-managed facilities, the agronomic assessment recommended establishment of a trial area at Silver Jubilee Sporting Fields as an initial, low-risk evaluation step. This would enable Council to assess performance under the site's specific utilisation, environmental and operational conditions and inform any future decisions regarding broader turf replacement or renewal works.
Capacity and effectiveness of the irrigation system.
While a detailed irrigation assessment was outside the scope of the agronomic audit and the irrigation system was not observed in operation, the assessment identified irrigation performance as a factor that may be influencing field condition outcomes. Accordingly, it is recommended that an irrigation audit be undertaken prior to implementation of rehabilitation works.
Three (3) rehabilitation options have been developed for Council's consideration.
Option 1 – Enhanced Maintenance and Soil Recovery Program
Scope
· Scarification of playing surfaces.
· Hollow coring.
· Soil amendment applications.
· Fertiliser applications.
· Organic top dressing.
· Turf recovery works.
· Temporary
Mentions: Spring Mountain
2. Response to Notice of Motion - Ipswich Athletics Facility and Bill Paterson Oval
Resolution: Moved by Councillor David Martin:
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13366436
ITEM: 2
SUBJECT: Response to Notice of Motion - Ipswich Athletics Facility and Bill Paterson Oval
AUTHOR: Asset Manager
DATE: 17 September 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the response to the Notice of Motion presented to council on
27 August 2026 regarding Ipswich Athletics Facility and Bill Paterson Oval.
This report addresses recommendation B and C from the Notice of Motion, which in part were:
‘detailing costings for a scope of works to improve Bill Paterson Oval to the Grass Athletics Track standards required by Ipswich District Athletics, Ipswich Little Athletics, other users and the general public’.
‘ relevant council officers conduct engagement with Ipswich District Athletics and Ipswich Little Athletics for their knowledge and information’.
Recommendation/s
A. That Council consider support of Option One to be undertaken as the immediate response for rectification of Bill Paterson Oval within the current financial year.
B. That Council consider supporting further investigation and design activities to determine the best value outcome for further rectification works to inform future years funding allocation during the next capital program budget deliberations.
C. That Council continue consultation with the relevant stakeholders regarding access to and closure of Bill Paterson Oval to complete any rectification works.
RELATED PARTIES
There are no known conflicts of interest to declare with this report.
Related parties in relation to this report are as follows:
- Community, Cultural and Economic Development Department, Community and Cultural Services Branch
- Ipswich Districts Athletics
- Ipswich Little Athletics
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
This report is in response to the Notice of Motion recommendations presented and adopted at Council on 27 August 2026. A copy of the adopted resolution to the Notice of Motion – Ipswich Athletics Facility and Bill Paterson Oval is presented as Attachment 1.
Recommendation B states:
That a report be prepared for no later than the 29 October 2026 Meeting of Council detailing costings for a scope of works to improve Bill Paterson Oval to the Grass Athletics Track standards required by Ipswich District Athletics, Ipswich Little Athletics, other users and the general public. With said scope of works to consider at minimum: the levelling of the entire surface as required, compaction, returfing (including appropriately graded soil) and any required improvements to drainage.
The following three (3) options have been considered and prepared in response to recommendation B regarding rectification works to Bill Paterson Oval.
Based on all available detailed investigation data and site inspections, the key concerns to address through any site works include:
- uneven field levels
- shrink/swell-related movement
- soft or ponded areas
- drainage limitations
- undulated running lanes within the 400m track.
These defects all affect field usability, create potential trip and surface safety hazards, increase maintenance demand, and reduce confidence that any short-term surface works will deliver a lasting outcome.
Options Two and Three will require additional site investigations and design work to ensure a quality outcome that addresses the site risks and issues.
Table One: Bill Paterson Oval Treatment Options
Option
Scope
Estimated Cost / Construction Timeframe
Option One
Localised Temporary Repair
Targeted intervention to the worst affected areas only.
Scope limited to localised turf and topsoil treatment and compaction to depressed areas to achieve serviceable outcomes in the short term.
Will offer an immediate response to the current issues.
$340,000 /
Construction timeframe – 13 weeks
Option Two
Whole of field Improvements
Scope is for improvement outcomes to the full field area.
Interim treatment that does not fully stabilise the underlying landfill; installation and compaction of engineered fill to targeted areas only.
Improvement works to existing overland flow and stormwater outcomes.
Would include removal and reinstatement of some existing specific sporting and infrastructure assets.
Broader interim solution that would support the site for a number of years.
$ 4.11 million /
Construction timeframe – 16 weeks
Option Three
Semi-permanent Rehabilitation
Scope addresses the rehabilitation of the full field area including stabilised capping of landfill areas, stripping of 300mm top layer and installation of turf and soil profile.
New drainage design to manage stormwater flow.
Remove and reinstall impacted existing sporting and infrastructure assets.
This solution offers the broadest, least maintenance-intensive outcome and significantly extends the useful life of the track.
$ 6.94 million /
Construction timeframe – 18 weeks
All costs have been prepared based on current available site information and include council on costs and specific option based concept design investigations. Estimated delivery timeframes are based on current concept scope, indicative only, and exclude design and investigation. Confirmation of delivery impacts and potential for onsite delays will be finalised after the design and investigation period.
Each option will require careful consideration of the time needed for new turf surfaces to establish. Sufficient establishment time must be allowed to ensure the track performs as intended and delivers the desired outcomes.
An Existing Site Plan is included as Attachment 2, detailing the infrastructure currently available to the site. Any existing sporting assets impacted by the field works would be replaced to current standards. Any proposed works to increase the level of service, upgrade specific assets, or install new assets would need to be funded outside the field scope of works.
A full technical report is included as Attachment 3 (confidential).
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Not Applicable
policy implications
There are no policy implications regarding this report.
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The overall site risk considerations that have been considered for all options include:
· Landfill and contamination risk
· Risk for further and future settlement
· Water management and poor drainage risks
· Existing stormwater assets
· Lime stabilisation suitability for any level of proposed treatment
· Geosynthetic performance for any level of proposed treatment
· Construction quality and validation of activities on site.
Key risks to each of the options are presented below:
Table Two: Bill Paterson Oval Options Risks and Outcomes
Option
Risks
Outcomes
Option One
Localised Temporary Repair
Ongoing landfill management.
High risk of continued surface movement.
Site stormwater management.
Limited impact to site use.
Management of immediate field outcomes.
Highest consequential maintenance cost outcomes.
Extend asset life for up to two years.
Option Two
Whole of field Improvements
Locally addresses site condition with improvements.
No ongoing landfill management.
Future surface treatment movement.
Underlying landfill management is not addressed.
Reduced upfront consequential maintenance outcomes.
Extend asset life for up to 5-10 years.
Option Three
Semi-permanent Rehabilitation
Increased impact to site use while under construction.
High environmental impacts during construction.
Uncovering further landfill not identified during investigation.
Best outcome for ongoing management of site landfill.
Overall best maintenance costs outcomes.
Improved site performance and on going level of service.
Extended asset life to 15-20 years.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
Costs to undertake any level of rectification to Bill Paterson Oval are not currently included in FY 2026-2027 capital or operational budget. Funding will need to be identified, and allocation to the project will depend
Mentions: Ipswich
4. Response to Petition - Opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13322950
ITEM: 4
SUBJECT: Response to Petition - Opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes
AUTHOR: Team Lead (Open Space)
DATE: 23 September 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the submission of a petition opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes.
Recommendation/s
A. That the report be received and the contents noted.
B. That Council proceed with the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes.
C. That Council undertake a further assessment of Spring Lake Park with consideration to identifying opportunities to enhance community safety and the amenity of the park.
D. That the chief petitioner be advised of the outcome of this report.
RELATED PARTIES
There was no declaration of conflicts of interest.
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Safe, Inclusive and Creative
Purpose of Report/Background
At the Council Ordinary meeting on 30 July 2026, a petition was presented on behalf of Mrs Helen Woodward-Brown and residents of Springfield Lakes, opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes (Refer to Attachment 1).
The Petition
The submitted petition contained 47 signatories. The petition outlined that the local community requests that Council;
· Does not proceed with the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes.
· Recognise that the existing nearby public toilets facilities adequately service the area.
· Redirect the proposed project funding towards initiatives that enhance community safety and park amenity, including CCTV coverage, improved lighting, landscaping and other community-prioritised improvements.
· Preserve Spring Lake Park as a safe, open and family friendly recreational space for residents and visitors.
Officers’ response to the Petition
Additional Toilets
Council parkland commonly named Spring Lake Park is classified as a District Level Recreation Park. Council’s desired standard of service for the embellishment of a District Level Recreation Park includes the provision of toilets. At present, there are toilets located in the southeastern area of Spring Lake Park, near Springfield Lakes Boulevard. Due to the overall size of the park and physical distance between the southeastern and northern areas of the park (Refer to Attachment 2), there is justification to provide additional toilets to meet current and future community demand. The provision of additional toilets for the park has been a long-standing Council project, with consideration to requests from community and various groups.
Council allocated funding in the 2025/2026 financial year for a preliminary design assessment (PDA) and concept planning for toilets in this northern area of the park. Council’s current capital works program identifies funding in the 2027/2028 – 2028/2029 financial years for construction of the toilets. The commitment of the construction funding will be subject to the annual budget process.
The PDA reviewed two locations for consideration in the northern area of the park (Refer to Attachment 3). The PDA included review of universal access, tree management, benefit/disbenefit analysis, cost structure and risk assessment. The concept plans for each location option informed the physical extent of the project and potential visual amenity impacts to adjacent residents. Location 2, closest to Spring Lake, presents as the preferred location for new toilets for the following reasons.
· Compliant access for patrons utilising the area of the parkland closer to Spring Lake.
· Presents the least visual impact to adjacent residents.
· Reduced risk to existing trees.
· The most cost effective of the two options.
Community Safety and Park Amenity
Spring Lake Park has been embellished in general accordance with Council’s desired standard of service for a District Level Recreation Park. The parkland was dedicated to Council in 2002. The primary embellishments / amenity of the park include;
· Pathway network
· Picnic shelters
· Toilets
· Lighting (Note: The entirety of the circulation path around Spring Lake is not illuminated)
· Playground (split over two locations)
· Gardens and open lawn areas
Acknowledging the age and growing patronage of the park, it is recommended that Council undertake a further assessment of the park, with consideration to identifying opportunities to enhance community safety and the amenity of the park.
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
policy implications
The petition opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes was assessed against Council’s Desired Standards of Service for Public Parks.
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The provision of new public toilets in Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes had the potential to impact the visual amenity for existing residents and the local environment. The PDA and concept planning to assess suitable locations for new public toilets in Spring Lake Park, Springfield has indicated how these risks can be mitigated.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
Council has previously allocated funding in the 2025-2026 financial year for the PDA and concept planning for toilets in this northern area of the park. Council’s current capital works program identifies funding in the 2027-2028 – 2028-2029 financial years for construction of the toilets. The commitment of the construction funding will be subject to the annual budget process.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
Council officers have not undertaken community engagement with respect to the PDA and concept planning for new toilets in Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes.
Conclusion
A petition opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes was presented at the Council Ordinary meeting on 30 July 2026.
Council has undertaken a preliminary design assessment and concept planning to identify a preferred location for new toilets in Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes. A location close to Spring Lake is the preferred site. It is proposed to undertake further assessment of Spring Lake Park to identify any other opportunities to enhance community safety and amenity. Councils’ current capital works program identifies funding in the 2027/2028 – 2028/2029 financial years for construction of the toilets. The commitment of the construction funding will be subject to the annual budget process.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
OTHER DECISION
(a) What is the Act/Decision being made?
Recommendation A states that the report be received and the contents noted.
Recommendation B states that Council proceed with the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes.
Recommendation C states that Council undertake a further assessment of Spring Lake Park with consideration to identifying opportunities to enhance community safety and the amenity of the park.
Recommendation D states that the chief petitioner be advised of the outcome of this report.
(b) What human rights are affected?
Not applicable
(c) How are the human rights limited?
Not applicable
(d) Is there a good reason for limiting the relevant rights? Is the limitation fair and reasonable?
Not applicable
(e) Conclusion
The decision is consistent with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Petition opposing the proposed public toilet facility at Spring Lake Park, Springfield Lakes ⇩
2.
Area investigated for new public toilets in Spring Lake Park, Springfield ⇩
3.
Location options investigated for new public toilets in Spring Lake Park, Springfield ⇩
Mark Bastin
Team Lead (Open Space)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Mary Torres
Infrastructure Strategy and Planning Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Tony Dileo
Manager, Infrastructure
Mentions: Springfield Lakes Boulevard · Springfield Lakes · Springfield
5. Asset and Infrastructure Services Department Capital Delivery Report August 2026
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13370383
ITEM: 5
SUBJECT: Asset and Infrastructure Services Department Capital Delivery Report August 2026
AUTHOR: Principal Officer (Program Management)
DATE: 18 September 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the performance of the capital delivery program by the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department for the month of August 2026.
Recommendation/s
That the report on capital delivery by the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department for the month of August 2026 be received and the contents noted.
RELATED PARTIES
There are no known conflicts of interest in relation to this report.
ifuture Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
The Asset and Infrastructure Services Department's Capital Works Program achieved a monthly expenditure of $6.22 million for the month of August, against an adopted baseline budget of $6.07 million, resulting in a positive variance of $0.14 million.
The year-to-date expenditure for the month currently sits at $15.57 million against an adopted budget for the financial year of $130.55 million, leaving a remaining budget of $114.98 million.
Building on the strong performance achieved in the previous financial year, the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department's Capital Works Program has made a positive start to 2026-27. Early results show good progress across the program, supporting expectations for the delivery of planned capital works throughout the financial year.
The table below shows the baseline for the published budget and expenditure to date for the 2026-2027 FY.
Asset Rehabilitation overall, achieved an actual spend of $1.46 million for the month of August.
Johnston Street, Bellbird Park is a Sealed Road Rehabilitation Project identified for delivery in the 2026–27 financial year. Expenditure for the reporting period totalled $372,857 against a baseline budget of $150,000, reflecting the good progress achieved during the month. Construction activities included completion of the new kerb and channel, followed by placement and completion of the final pavement layers.
Tallon Street Footpath Renewal works at Sadliers Crossing has been delayed due to AGIG gas service relocation works, with Council awaiting confirmation of the relocation schedule. Civil construction is now planned to commence in early November, subject to completion of utility relocations. This delay has impacted expenditure, with August spending of $833 against a monthly budget of $200,000.
The East Ipswich Stage 2 Drainage Upgrade project commenced on site in July following the successful completion of procurement activities and contractor mobilisation. Progress during August was impacted by service-related issues that required additional investigation and coordination with service authorities. Consequently, construction activities were more limited than planned for much of the reporting period, with works expected to recommence in early September. Project expenditure for the reporting period totalled $106,461, compared with a baseline budget of $385,000.
Local Amenity had an actual expenditure of $210,859 for the month.
The design phase of the Cultural Heart Revitalisation project for d’Arcy Doyle Place continued during the reporting period. Recognising the site's importance as a prominent civic and cultural precinct, the project seeks to deliver improved safety and public amenity outcomes for the community. Expenditure for the period totalled $181,356 against a baseline budget of $49,000, reflecting the advancement of the design phase.
Transport and Traffic overall, achieved an actual spend of $3.43 million for the month of August .
Construction of the new footpath associated with the pedestrian link through the existing Queensland Rail underpass on Gordon Street, Ipswich, progressed well during August, with works focusing on kerb, footpath, retaining wall and landscaping activities. Expenditure for the month was $636,921 against a budget of $290,000, reflecting the progress achieved and the delivery of key project milestones. Completion is scheduled for September, at which time the project will provide a safe and compliant pedestrian connection where none previously existed.
The Ripley Road and Reif Street Intersection Upgrade progressed as planned during the reporting period, achieving practical completion on 1 September 2026. Key activities included completion of pavement, drainage, line marking, signage and remaining civil works, followed by project close-out activities. Project expenditure for August totalled $514,223, compared with a baseline budget of $700,000. The variance reflects the completion of construction works and the timing of final contractor payments as the project transitioned into close-out.
Progress continued across the Ripley and Fischer Road Stages 1, 2 and 3 Strategic Transport Upgrade projects during August. Stage 1 civil works remained on schedule, with key milestones achieved including the implementation of a traffic switch and excavation works at the Rex Hills corner to facilitate construction of the new sandstone block wall adjacent to GYG. Excavated material was repurposed as fill to raise subgrade levels over the completed section of Culvert 01 between Vision Street and Monterea Drive. Construction activities also commenced on custom stormwater structures at the culvert entrance.
Stages 2 and 3 remain contingent on the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Controlled Action Determination. Progress on the determination has been impacted by extended assessment timeframes resulting from requests for additional information and clarification from the National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA). Subject to approval, public utility relocations are anticipated to commence in early 2027. Detailed design activities continue to progress and are approaching finalisation. Total expenditure across all three stages in August was $1.13 million against a budget of $1.41 million, representing expenditure below budget for the reporting period.
Works on the Keidges Road Footpath Improvement project continued across August, with construction of the shared path, kerb ramps and fencing nearing completion. The remaining civil works are currently scheduled for completion by mid-September, subject to favourable weather conditions. Procurement activities for the landscaping component are also progressing and are expected to be completed by October 2026; this will be subject to contractor availability. August expenditure totalled $314,443 against a budget of $212,000. Overall, the project remains on track and is tracking towards a reduced total spend for this financial year against the approved annual budget for the financial year.
Progress on the Springfield Parkway Stage 2 upgrade continued throughout August, with major service relocation activities advancing and early construction works commencing in preparation for Stage 2 delivery. Project expenditure for August totalled $403,402, compared with a monthly budget of $241,547. The variance is primarily due to the ongoing service relocation works and the advance procurement of materials to support forthcoming project stages.
Parks and Recreation overall achieved an actual spend of $234,272.
The Limestone Park Dog Off-Leash Area reached Practical Completion during the month, with expenditure of $216,569 against a budget of $100,000. The increased spend reflects additional turf installation and community-requested enhancements to support immediate public use. The facility is now open, with minor works remaining, including handrail installation and line marking. Delays in light pole delivery have resulted in the remaining electrical works being rescheduled to November.
Flood Mitigation and Drainage overall, achieved an actual spend of $191,321 for the month of August.
Fleet experienced a $558,818 spend for the month.
The Truck Replacement Program rec
Mentions: Arcy Doyle Place · Fischer Road · Gordon Street · Johnston Street · Keidges Road · Monterea Drive · Reif Street · Ripley Road · Sealed Road · Tallon Street · Vision Street · Bellbird Park · Sadliers Crossing · East Ipswich · Ipswich · Ripley · Springfield
6. Provisional Projects Approval
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13402040
ITEM: 6
SUBJECT: Provisional Projects Approval
AUTHOR: Infrastructure Strategy and Planning Manager
DATE: 25 September 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report seeking Council consideration of, and capital funding for, the Provisional Project listed in this report.
The project has been suggested by the Mayor for assessment against the Capital Investment in Provisional Projects Policy.
The project noted in this report has been assessed by the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department and is considered consistent with the policy and is tabled for consideration by Council to progress.
Recommendation
That Council approve the Provisional Project listed below and progress to design and construction, in accordance with the Capital Investment in Provisional Projects Policy:
1. Division 3 – The Missing Matter – The Green Seat Project within Riverheart Parklands, Ipswich- $1,500.
RELATED PARTIES
There are no known conflicts of interest associated with this report.
ifuture Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
Council has an adopted Capital Investment in Provisional Projects Policy (the Policy) that enables the community and elected representatives to put forward capital projects that are not currently included for delivery in the three-year capital works program.
This project has been put forward to be considered by the Mayor and assessed by the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department.
Council officers have assessed the nominated project against the Policy. Based on this assessment, the Provisional Project outlined in Table 1 below is presented for consideration by Council. Further details on the project can be viewed in Attachment 1 of this report.
Table 1 – Proposed Provisional Project
Division
Project
Order of Cost
3
The Missing Matter – The Green Seat Project within Riverheart Parklands, Ipswich
$1,500
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
policy implications
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the Capital Investment in Provisional Projects Policy.
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
There are no risks associated with the proposed Provisional Project as outlined in this report.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
The Council has committed to Provisional Projects in the 2026-2027 budget. The project proposed in this report is to be allocated from funds already approved by Council and no additional funds are being sought.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
No formal consultation has been conducted in relation to this report.
Conclusion
The Asset and Infrastructure Services Department has assessed the proposed Provisional Project. This assessment concluded that the project outlined in this report is in accordance with the Provisional Projects Policy and may be progressed to construction should Council determine to proceed with it.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
OTHER DECISION
(a) What is the Act/Decision being made?
The recommendation states that Council approve the Provisional Project listed below progress to design and construction, in accordance with the Capital Investment in Provisional Projects Policy:
1. Division 3 – The Missing Matter – The Green Seat Project within Riverheart Parklands, Ipswich- $1,500.
(b) What human rights are affected?
Nil
(c) How are the human rights limited?
Nil
(d) Is there a good reason for limiting the relevant rights? Is the limitation fair and reasonable?
Not applicable
(e) Conclusion
The decision is consistent with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Division 3 - The Missing Matter - The Green Seat Project: Project Details ⇩
Mary Torres
Infrastructure Strategy and Planning Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Tony Dileo
Manager, Infrastructure Strategy
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Seren McKenzie
General Manager (Asset and Infrastructure Services)
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 October
2026
Item 6 / Attachment 1.
Mentions: Ipswich
7. Exercise of Delegation Report
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13396434
ITEM: 7
SUBJECT: Exercise of Delegation Report
AUTHOR: Development Operations Manager
DATE: 24 September 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning applications that have been determined by delegated authority for the period 27 August to 24 September 2026.
Recommendation/s
That the Exercise of Delegation report for the period 27 August to 24 September 2026 be received and the contents noted.
RELATED PARTIES
There are no related parties associated with the recommendation as the development applications have already been determined.
corporate plan Theme
A Trusted and Leading Organisation
Purpose of Report/Background
The following delegations (and associated sub-delegations) contain a requirement for the noting of applications determined by delegated authority:
· Approval of Plans for Springfield
· Determination of Development Applications, Precinct Plans, Area Development Plans and Related Matters
· Exercise the Powers of Council under the Economic Development Act 2012
· Implementation of the Planning and Development Program
· Exercise the Powers of Council under the Planning Act 2016
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
policy implications
N/A
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
There are no risk management implications associated with this report.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
There are no resourcing or budget implications associated with this report.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
The contents of this report did not require any community consultation. In the event that the development applications listed in this report triggered ‘impact assessment’ pursuant to the Ipswich Planning Scheme, public notification was undertaken as part of the development application process in accordance with any legislative requirements and matters raised in any submissions and were addressed in the respective development assessment reports.
Conclusion
The Planning and Regulatory Services Department is responsible for the assessment and determination of development applications. Attachment 1 to this report provides a list of development applications that were determined by delegated authority for the period
27 th August to 24 th September 2026.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
RECEIVE AND NOTE REPORT
The Recommendation states that the report be received and the contents noted. The decision to receive and note the report does not limit human rights. Therefore, the decision is compatible with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Applications Determined by Authority - Sept 2026 ⇩
Anthony Bowles
Development Operations Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Brett Davey
General Manager (Planning and Regulatory Services)
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 October
2026
Item 7 / Attachment 1.
Mentions: Springfield · Ipswich
8. Planning and Environment Court Action Status Report
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 October
2026
Doc ID No: A13396459
ITEM: 8
SUBJECT: Planning and Environment Court Action Status Report
AUTHOR: Development Operations Manager
DATE: 24 September 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning a status update with respect to current court actions associated with development planning applications.
Recommendation/s
That the Planning and Environment Court Action status report be received and the contents noted.
RELATED PARTIES
The related parties, being the appellants associated with any court actions, are detailed in the attachment to this report.
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Safe, Inclusive and Creative
Natural and Sustainable
A Trusted and Leading Organisation
Purpose of Report/Background
Whilst this report outlines a specific list of development application related court actions, from time to time, Council will be engaged in prosecutions relating to development offences and other matters. Owing to the nature of these prosecutions, these matters are not generally listed in the attached court action report. However substantial matters will be presented to the Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee using this report from time to time.
Further information on these appeals can be found on the Planning and Environment Court web site.
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
policy implications
N/A
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
There are no risk management implications associated with this report.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
N/A
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
The contents of this report did not require any community consultation.
Conclusion
The Planning and Regulatory Services Department are currently involved with several Planning and Environment Court and Supreme Court matters. Attachment 1 to this report provides a current status with respect to these matters.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
RECEIVE AND NOTE REPORT
The recommendation states that the report be received and the contents noted. The decision to receive and note the report does not limit human rights. Therefore, the decision is compatible with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Court Action Status Report - Sept 2026 ⇩
Anthony Bowles
Development Operations Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Brett Davey
General Manager (Planning and Regulatory Services)
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 October
2026
Item 8 / Attachment 1.
Source: Ipswich City Council meeting agenda (CC BY 4.0).