Home › Meetings › Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee — 2026-09-15
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee — 2026-09-15
Projects discussed: Ripley Road and Reif Street Intersection Upgrade
2. Exercise of Delegation Report
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 September
2026
Doc ID No: A13279753
ITEM: 2
SUBJECT: Exercise of Delegation Report
AUTHOR: Development Operations Manager
DATE: 27 August 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning applications that have been determined by delegated authority for the period 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026.
Recommendation/s
That the Exercise of Delegation report for the period 23 July 2026 to 27 August 2026 be received and the contents noted.
RELATED PARTIES
There are no related parties associated with the recommendation as the development applications have already been determined.
corporate plan Theme
A Trusted and Leading Organisation
Purpose of Report/Background
The following delegations (and associated sub-delegations) contain a requirement for the noting of applications determined by delegated authority:
· Approval of Plans for Springfield
· Determination of Development Applications, Precinct Plans, Area Development Plans and Related Matters
· Exercise the Powers of Council under the Economic Development Act 2012
· Implementation of the Planning and Development Program
· Exercise the Powers of Council under the Planning Act 2016
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
policy implications
N/A
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
There are no risk management implications associated with this report.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
There are no resourcing or budget implications associated with this report.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
The contents of this report did not require any community consultation. In the event that the development applications listed in this report triggered ‘impact assessment’ pursuant to the Ipswich Planning Scheme, public notification was undertaken as part of the development application process in accordance with any legislative requirements and matters raised in any submissions and were addressed in the respective development assessment reports.
Conclusion
The Planning and Regulatory Services Department is responsible for the assessment and determination of development applications. Attachment 1 to this report provides a list of development applications that were determined by delegated authority for the period
23 rd July 2026 to 27 th August 2026.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
RECEIVE AND NOTE REPORT
The Recommendation states that the report be received and the contents noted. The decision to receive and note the report does not limit human rights. Therefore, the decision is compatible with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Applications Determined by Authority August 2026 ⇩
Anthony Bowles
Development Operations Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Brett Davey
General Manager (Planning and Regulatory Services)
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 2 / Attachment 1.
Mentions: Springfield · Ipswich
3. Planning and Environment Court Action Status Report
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 September
2026
Doc ID No: A13279800
ITEM: 3
SUBJECT: Planning and Environment Court Action Status Report
AUTHOR: Development Operations Manager
DATE: 27 August 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning a status update with respect to current court actions associated with development planning applications.
Recommendation/s
That the Planning and Environment Court Action status report be received and the contents noted.
RELATED PARTIES
The related parties, being the appellants associated with any court actions, are detailed in the attachment to this report.
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Safe, Inclusive and Creative
Natural and Sustainable
A Trusted and Leading Organisation
Purpose of Report/Background
Whilst this report outlines a specific list of development application related court actions, from time to time, Council will be engaged in prosecutions relating to development offences and other matters. Owing to the nature of these prosecutions, these matters are not generally listed in the attached court action report. However substantial matters will be presented to the Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee using this report from time to time.
Further information on these appeals can be found on the Planning and Environment Court web site.
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
policy implications
N/A
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
There are no risk management implications associated with this report.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
N/A
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
The contents of this report did not require any community consultation.
Conclusion
The Planning and Regulatory Services Department are currently involved with several Planning and Environment Court and Supreme Court matters. Attachment 1 to this report provides a current status with respect to these matters.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
RECEIVE AND NOTE REPORT
The recommendation states that the report be received and the contents noted. The decision to receive and note the report does not limit human rights. Therefore, the decision is compatible with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Court Action Status Report August 2026 ⇩
Anthony Bowles
Development Operations Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Brett Davey
General Manager (Planning and Regulatory Services)
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 3 / Attachment 1.
4. Asset and Infrastructure Services Department Capital Delivery Report July 2026
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 September
2026
Doc ID No: A13263797
ITEM: 4
SUBJECT: Asset and Infrastructure Services Department Capital Delivery Report July 2026
AUTHOR: Principal Officer (Program Management)
DATE: 24 August 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the performance of the capital delivery program by the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department for the month of July 2026.
Recommendation/s
That the report on capital delivery by the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department for the month of July 2026 be received and the contents noted.
RELATED PARTIES
There are no known conflicts of interest in relation to this report.
ifuture Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
The Asset and Infrastructure Services Department's Capital Works Program achieved a monthly expenditure of $9.35 million for the month of July, against an adopted baseline budget of $4.99 million, resulting in a positive variance of $4.36 million.
The year-to-date expenditure for the month currently sits at $9.35 million against an adopted budget for the financial year of $130.55 million, leaving a remaining budget of $121.20 million.
Building on the strong performance achieved in the previous financial year, the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department's Capital Works Program has made a positive start to 2026-27. Early results show good progress across the program, supporting expectations for the delivery of planned capital works throughout the financial year.
The table below shows the baseline for the published budget and expenditure to date for the 2026-2027 FY.
Asset Rehabilitation overall, achieved an actual spend of $1.99 million for the month of July.
The East Ipswich Stage 2 Drainage Upgrade project commenced on site in July following the successful completion of procurement activities and contractor mobilisation. Works undertaken during the month included site establishment and the commencement of drainage construction activities. Project expenditure for July totalled $531,744 compared with a baseline budget of $200,000, reflecting the commencement of civil works during the reporting period.
The Pavement Marking Program continued to deliver reactive pavement marking renewals during July, with works prioritised based on routine inspections and condition assessments to maintain compliance with visibility and reflectivity standards. Expenditure for the month totalled $185,280 against a budget of $73,250.
Drainage rehabilitation works on Blackstone Road, Eastern Heights, achieved Practical Completion in mid-July. The completed works will improve stormwater management and reduce the risk of localised drainage impacts on adjacent properties. July expenditure totalled $395,595 against a nil budget for the reporting period, reflecting the completion of the 25-26FY works.
Culvert relining works for the existing box culvert on Fawkner Crescent, Karalee, were completed in July, with all project costs finalised and the project subsequently closed. Delivery of the works occurred later than originally planned due to procurement lead time delays associated with sourcing the culvert liner from an overseas supplier. July expenditure totalled $108,454 against a nil budget for the reporting period, reflecting the completion of the works.
Local Amenity had an actual expenditure of $359,393 for the month.
Transport and Traffic overall, achieved an actual spend of $6.08 million for the month of July .
Works on the Keidges Road Footpath Improvements project continued throughout July, with construction of the shared path, kerb ramps, fencing and landscaping progressing as planned. July expenditure totalled $191,385 against a budget of $363,000, reflecting lower than forecast expenditure following the transition to a single onsite construction crew. Civil works remain on track for completion in late August, subject to favourable weather conditions, with landscaping and streetscaping works expected to be completed by October 2026, subject to contractor availability.
Construction of the new footpath associated with the pedestrian link through the existing Queensland Rail underpass on Marsden Parade, Ipswich, progressed well during the month. Activities focused on the installation of concrete kerb and channel, stormwater pits, retaining walls, and associated footpath works. Once completed, the project will provide safe and compliant pedestrian access where none previously existed. Actual expenditure for July was $326,061 against a monthly budget of $495,000. Construction activities remain on track, with works currently programmed for completion early September 2026, weather permitting.
The Ripley Road and Reif Street intersection upgrade continued to progress well during the reporting period, with key civil and drainage works advancing across the site. Major activities included kerb and channel construction, installation of in-situ stormwater pits, and construction of new footpaths and driveway connections. Night-time asphalt paving was undertaken to minimise traffic impacts, while new traffic islands were constructed on the Cunningham Highway on ramp to improve traffic management and road safety. Financial results for July recorded actual expenditure of $1.79 million against a baseline budget of $800,000, reflecting the increased level of construction activity and associated contractor payments as works progressed.
Progress continued across the Ripley and Fischer Road Stages 1, 2 and 3 Strategic Transport Upgrade projects in July. Stage 1 civil works remained on schedule, with earthworks, drainage, and preparatory works for pavement and service installations underway. Stages 2 and 3 remain dependent on the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Controlled Action Determination, expected in October. Subject to approval, public utility plant installation will commence thereafter, while design work remains on track. July expenditure across all three stages totalled $3.33 million against a budget of $1.495 million. The variance was primarily due to the timing of property acquisitions, and the early commencement of Stage 1 construction works. Further acquisition expenditure is anticipated in October and November.
Parks and Recreation overall achieved an actual spend of $139,129.
Flood Mitigation and Drainage overall, achieved an actual spend of $108,122 for the month of July.
Fleet experienced a $524,975 spend for the month.
The Truck Replacement Program recorded expenditure of $367,550 against a nil budget in July. This variance reflects the partial receipting of asphalt trucks as part of Council’s fleet renewal program.
The Vehicle Replacement Program incurred expenditure of $146,884 against a nil baseline budget in July. This expenditure is associated with a number of vehicles received late last financial year. A receipting review is currently being undertaken to assess whether the costs should be adjusted and recognised in the prior financial year.
Summary
The Capital Works Program of the Asset and Infrastructure Services Department began the new financial year on a positive note, achieving better-than-anticipated results. For the month, the department reported total expenditure of $9.35 million against an adopted baseline budget of $4.99 million.
Key contributors to this result included good progress on major projects, including the continuation of drainage upgrades at Blackstone Road and East Ipswich Stage 2, the receipt of a number of fleet purchases within the sub-program, and strong progress across several other initiatives.
The department continues to assess and progress key projects and activities previously identified for carryover due to known constraints, with a continued focus on completing the associated close-out activities.
While managing these carryover works, the department is also taking a proactive approach to project delivery by leveraging favourable conditions and available resources
Mentions: Blackstone Road · Cunningham Highway · Fawkner Crescent · Fischer Road · Keidges Road · Marsden Parade · Reif Street · Ripley Road · East Ipswich · Blackstone · Eastern Heights · Karalee · Ipswich · Ripley
5. Public Monuments and Memorials - Application to upgrade the War Memorial at ANZAC Park, Rosewood
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 September
2026
Doc ID No: A13246579
ITEM: 5
SUBJECT: Public Monuments and Memorials - Application to upgrade the War Memorial at ANZAC Park, Rosewood
AUTHOR: Team Lead (Open Space)
DATE: 19 August 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning a Public Monuments and Memorials application received from the Rosewood RSL sub-branch, proposing an upgrade to the existing war memorial within ANZAC Park, Rosewood.
Recommendation/s
A. That the report be received and the contents noted.
B. That the Public Monument and Memorials application for the upgrade of the war memorial within ANZAC Park, Rosewood be approved to proceed to stage 2 of the application and approval process.
C. That the design for the upgrade of the war memorial within ANZAC Park, Rosewood be revised accordingly through stage 2 of the process, with consideration to the key points noted in the officer’s assessment of the application, as outlined in this report including;
(i) The corten panelling is reduced in size to ensure suitable passive surveillance to support community safety and asset protection
(ii) The standard park furniture (bench seat) is used in accordance with Council standards and specifications
(iii) A suitable alternative to inground uplighting is used and approved by Council.
RELATED PARTIES
Not Applicable
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
Council has received a Public Monuments and Memorials (PMM) application from Rosewood RSL sub-branch (refer to Attachment 1). The application proposes an upgrade to the existing war memorial located within ANZAC Park, Rosewood. The proposed concept plans for the upgrade can be viewed in Attachment 2, and additional information on the significance of the upgrade is provided in Attachment 3.
The PMM application has been assessed by Council officers in accordance with the current ‘ Public Monuments and Memorials Policy’ and associated ‘ Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure’ which are respectively provided in Attachment 4 and 5 of this report. Attachment 6 of this report includes the officer assessment of the PMM application (inclusive of attachments to the application) using the abovementioned policy and procedure.
Listed below are key points of the PMM application officer assessment:
1. The proposal is significant to the Ipswich Area.
2. The proposal for upgrade works to the Rosewood Memorial is supported “in principle” by council officers, subject to design amendments, as detailed below:
A. ANZAC Park primarily functions as a local level sports park. The facility includes a playground, war memorial, sports fields, club house and memorial hall. The war memorial is located at the main access frontage of the park. The current design of the proposed memorial upgrade works includes corten panelling, ranging in heights from 1.75m – 3m in height, with a combined length of 16.5m. The current design for the panelling will restrict passive surveillance of the broader park, inclusive of the playground and sports fields. It is suggested that future design is revised to achieve suitable passive surveillance to support community safety and asset protection, whilst enhancing / maintaining the aesthetic of the war memorial space.
B. It is preferred that standard park furniture (bench seat) would be used in the proposed upgrade project, in accordance with Council standards, specifications and Asset Management principals.
C. The use of inground uplighting is not supported due to the ongoing maintenance, vandalism and whole-of-life-cycle perspective. Suitable alternatives are available and could be considered as part of the design stage.
Overall, in accordance with Stage 1 of the application and approval process for PMM applications, Council officers support the Rosewood RSL sub-branch proposal to undertake upgrades to the existing war memorial in ANZAC Park, Rosewood. If Council support the upgrade, it is proposed to move to stage 2 of the application and approval process which will allow Council to work with the Rosewood RSL sub-branch on revising the design for proposed upgrades to the war memorial.
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Not Applicable
policy implications
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following Council Policy and Procedure:
Public Monuments and Memorials Policy
Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Not Applicable
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
The assessment of this application for a Public Memorial has been undertaken using existing Council resources and budgets.
If the proposal is approved by Council, the applicant will be responsible for all costs associated with the design, fabrication, and installation of the memorial as per the current Council Policy and as indicated by the applicant in their submission.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
As part of the PPM application, the applicant has provided multiple letters of support for the proposal from community groups, business and elected members (refer to Attachment 7).
Council officers have assessed this application in accordance with the Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure and the Public Monuments and Memorials Policy. In assessing this application, the following internal consultation has occurred:
- Community and Cultural Services Branch (Community, Cultural and Economic Development Department)
- City Design Branch (Planning and Regulatory Services Department)
- Capital Delivery Branch (Assets and Infrastructure Services Department)
- Works and Field Services Branch (Assets and Infrastructure Services Department)
- Infrastructure Strategy Branch (Assets and Infrastructure Services Department)
Conclusion
Council has received a PMM application from the Rosewood RSL sub-branch. The application proposes upgrades to the existing war memorial in ANZAC Park, Rosewood. Council needs to give due consideration to providing support for the proposal, in accordance with Stage 1 of the application and approval process for PMM applications and allow the application to move into the next stage.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
OTHER DECISION
(a) What is the Act/Decision being made?
A. That the report be received and the contents noted.
B. That the Public Monument and Memorials application for the upgrade of the war memorial within ANZAC Park, Rosewood be approved to proceed to stage 2 of the application and approval process.
C. That the design for the upgrade of the war memorial within ANZAC Park, Rosewood be revised accordingly through stage 2 of the process, with consideration to the key points noted in the officer’s assessment of the application, as outlined in this report including;
(i) The corten panelling is reduced in size to ensure suitable passive surveillance to support community safety and asset protection
(ii) The standard park furniture (bench seat) is used in accordance with Council standards and specifications
(iii) A suitable alternative to inground uplighting is used and approved by Council.
(b) What human rights are affected?
Not Applicable
(c) How are the human rights limited?
Not Applicable
(d) Is there a good reason for limiting the relevant rights? Is the limitation fair and reasonable?
Not Applicable
(e) Conclusion
Assessment of the Public Monuments and Memorials Application from the Rosewood RSL sub-branch will not affect human rights.
Attachments
1.
Public Monuments & Memorials application ⇩
2.
Rosewood Memorial Upgrade Concept Design Brief ⇩
3.
Rosewood RSL_Memorial Upgrade Community Significance ⇩
4.
Public Monuments and Memorials Policy ⇩
5.
Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure ⇩
6.
Officer Assessment on the PMM upgrade of the ANZAC Park War Memorial ⇩
7.
Letters of support ⇩
Mark Bastin
Team Lead (Open S
6. Repeal and adoption of Policies related to Public Monuments and Memorials
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting Agenda
15 September
2026
Doc ID No: A13264895
ITEM: 6
SUBJECT: Repeal and adoption of Policies related to Public Monuments and Memorials
AUTHOR: Team Lead (Open Space)
DATE: 24 August 2026
Executive Summary
This is a report concerning the repeal of the Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and the Personal Tributes within Council’s Open Space and Road Network Policy , and replacing these policies with a new policy titled Public Memorials Policy .
RECOMMENDATION/S
A. That the policies titled Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and Personal Tributes within Councils Open Space and Road Network Policy be repealed.
B. That the proposed policy titled Public Memorials Policy be adopted.
RELATED PARTIES
Not Applicable
CORPORATE PLAN Theme
Vibrant and Growing
Purpose of Report/Background
Council receives applications from the public and / or community groups for the installation of public monuments, memorials or personal tributes across the City of Ipswich. A request for a public monument, memorial or personal tribute can be made to be placed within any asset of Council, typically within a public park or road reserve, but may include Council facilities.
Currently any application received is assessed in accordance with two Council policies, namely the following:
- Public monuments and memorials policy
- Personal tributes within Council’s open space and road network policy
The policies noted above have associated procedures to guide and assist Council staff in how to assess any applications received from either one of the policies. The existing policies and procedures can be found in Attachments 1 to 4 of this report.
The current policies and procedures are out of date and have undergone a review. The review presented an opportunity to refine the existing policies and to re-evaluate how Council would like to address requests for public monuments, memorials and personal tributes.
The current two policies have caused confusion for applicants, mainly regarding which application to complete and lodge for Council’s consideration. Hence, a new policy has been developed that consolidates consideration of memorials, monuments, personal tributes and plaques on land and assets owned and/or managed by Council into one policy and one application. The proposed new policy, titled Public Memorials Policy can be found in Attachment 5 of this report.
Through the review of the current policies, it has been noted that the policies do not clearly outline how roadside memorials should be addressed across the City. In this regard, the proposed new policy titled Public Memorials Policy also includes information on roadside memorials.
The proposal for roadside memorials in Council controlled road reserve aligns with the current approach used by the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) and other Queensland Local Government (LGA) Authorities. The proposed approach is to provide guidelines on installing roadside memorials and seek applicants to provide formal notification of any installation rather than making a formal application.
Should Council elect to adopt the proposed policy titled Public Memorials Policy , the following support documents will be developed to support the new policy:
• Public Memorials Procedure - new procedure to support Council staff in the assessment of applications.
• New guidelines and application form to support applicants through the process.
• New guidelines, fact sheets, notification form to support the appropriate installation of roadside memorials in Council controlled road reserve.
• Development of a new guideline / procedure to support the management of roadside memorials in Council controlled road reserve.
Legal IMPLICATIONS
This report and its recommendations are consistent with the following legislative provisions:
Local Government Act 2009
policy implications
The Public Memorials Policy will replace the Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and the Personal Tributes within Council’s Open Space and Road Network Policy .
RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
The repeal of the current Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and the Personal Tributes within Council’s Open Space and Road Network Policy and replacement with the new policy titled Personal Memorials Policy will mitigate risks for both community and Council.
Financial/RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
The Public Memorials Policy will be implemented using existing resources and operational budgets.
COMMUNITY and OTHER CONSULTATION
Consultation for the policy titled Public Memorials Policy has been undertaken with the Mayor and Councillors. No external consultation has been undertaken.
Conclusion
The Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and the Personal Tributes within Council’s Open Space and Road Network Policy have been reviewed and identified as being out of date with community expectations. The replacement of the Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and the Personal Tributes within Council’s Open Space and Road Network Policy with the Public Memorials Policy will provide an improved level of service for the community via a single application which covers memorials, monuments, personal tributes and plaques on land and assets owned and/or managed by Council.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPACTS
OTHER DECISION
(a) What is the Act/Decision being made?
Recommendations A and B state:
A. That the policies titled Public Monuments and Memorials Policy and Personal Tributes within Councils Open Space and Road Network Policy be repealed.
B. That the revised policy titled Public Memorials Policy be adopted.
(b) What human rights are affected?
Not Applicable
(c) How are the human rights limited?
Not Applicable
(d) Is there a good reason for limiting the relevant rights? Is the limitation fair and reasonable?
Not Applicable
(e) Conclusion
The decision is consistent with human rights.
Attachments
1.
Public Monuments and Memorials Policy ⇩
2.
Assessing Applications for Public Monuments and Memorials Procedure ⇩
3.
Personal Tributes within Council's Open Space and Road Network Policy ⇩
4.
Assessing applications for Personal tributes within Councils Open Space and Road Network Procedure ⇩
5.
Public Memorials Policy ⇩
Mark Bastin
Team Lead (Open Space)
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Mary Torres
Infrastructure Strategy and Planning Manager
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Tony Dileo
Manager, Infrastructure Strategy
I concur with the recommendations contained in this report.
Seren McKenzie
General Manager (Asset and Infrastructure Services)
“Together, we proudly enhance the quality of life for our community”
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 6 / Attachment 1.
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 6 / Attachment 2.
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 6 / Attachment 3.
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 6 / Attachment 4.
Infrastructure, Planning and Assets Committee
Meeting AGENDA
15 September
2026
Item 6 / Attachment 5.
Mentions: Ipswich
Source: Ipswich City Council meeting agenda (CC BY 4.0).